Since its first publication in 1945? Lord Russell's A History of Western Philosophy has been universally acclaimed as the outstanding one-volume work on the subject -- unparalleled in its comprehensiveness, its clarity, its erudition, its grace and wit. In seventy-six chapters he traces philosophy from the rise of Greek civilization to the emergence of logical analysis in the twentieth century. Among the philosophers considered are: Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, the Atomists, Protagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Cynics, the Sceptics, the Epicureans, the Stoics, Plotinus, Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine, Benedict, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Aquinas, Duns Scotus, William of Occam, Machiavelli, Erasmus, More, Bacon, Hobbes, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, the Utilitarians, Marx, Bergson, James, Dewey, and lastly the philosophers with whom Lord Russell himself is most closely associated -- Cantor, Frege, and Whitehead, co-author with Russell of the monumental Principia Mathematica.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book Description
Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links
(What's this?)|
|
-
|
20% Off philosophy Purchase. Free Shipping + 20% off Your Order
|
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
Review
'Remains unchallenged as the perfect introduction to its subject ... exactly the kind of philosophy that most people would like to read, but which only Russell could possibly have written.' - Ray Monk, University of Southampton, UK
'Beautiful and luminous prose, not merely classically clear but scrupulously honest.' - Isaiah Berlin
'It is a witty bird's-eye view of the main figures in Western thought enlivened by references to the personalities and quirks of the thinkers themselves.' - The Week
'A great philosopher's lucid and magisterial look at the history of his own subject, wonderfully readable and enlightening.' - The Observer
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.About the Author
Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, Viscount Amberley, born in Wales, May 18, 1872. Educated at home and at Trinity College, Cambridge. During World War I, served four months in prison as a pacifist, where he wrote Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. In 1910, published first volume of Principia Mathematica with Alfred Whitehead. Visited Russia and lectured on philosophy at the University of Peking in 1920. Returned to England and, with his wife, ran a progressive school for young children in Sussex from 1927-1932. Came to the United States, where he taught philosophy successively at the University of Chicago, University of California at Los Angeles, Harvard, and City College of New York. Awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1950. Has been active in disarmament and anti-nuclear-testing movements while continuing to add to his large number of published books which include Philosophical Essays (1910); The ABC of Relativity (1925) Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (1948); Why I Am Not a Christian (1957); and The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell (1967). For a chronological list of Russell's principal works see The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell (Simon and Schuster).
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970). Philosopher, mathematician, educational and sexual reformer, pacifist, prolific letter writer, author and columnist, Bertrand Russell was one of the most influential and widely known intellectual figures of the twentieth century. In 1950 he was awarded the Noble Prize for Literature in 1950 for his extensive contributions to world literature and for his "rationality and humanity, as a fearless champion of free speech and free thought in the West."
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
423 of 446 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Russell's "History of Western Philosophy" is not the best introduction to western philosophy that I have read. That place goes to Antony Flew's "Introduction to Western Philosophy." But for many readers, Russell's is still the better book. Flew's book is purely about philosophy. Russell, on the other hand, strives to place thought in its social context, and he is so successful that the book doubles as an outline history of the western world, and a very interesting one. Also, Russell's deep understanding of the relationship between philosophy and science adds interest. Finally, Russell's clear explanations of difficult concepts should make those concepts clear even to the novice or near-novice; Flew's book, although it assumes no knowledge of philosophy, is more technical, and so is not suitable for all novices.
Despite this book's well-deserved status as a classic work, it has some major flaws that a reader should keep in mind, all stemming from Russell's intolerance of viewpoints different from his own. Russell, like other logical positivists, saw no place for metaphysics in philosophy. In his "History of Western Philosophy," he makes no effort to curb that bias, resulting in what might be considered unfair treatments of all thinkers who did not stick purely to science. Also, Russell has no tolerance for systems of thought that do not conform to his preferences for democracy, atheism, pacifism, and social liberalism. So Plato is described as just another proponent of totalitarianism, Rousseau is portrayed as a crackpot and Nietzsche is depicted as a warmonger, but the much less significant thinkers John Dewey and William James get personal kudos for being nice progressive guys full of human kindness. Russell's book is a great place to start, but to get a fair treatment of thinkers such as Rousseau and Nietzsche, it should be supplemented with material such as the chapters on those thinkers in Strauss and Cropsey's "History of Political Philosophy." And, of course, read Copleston's "History of Philosophy" if you have time.
119 of 128 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
As a novice in the world of formal philosophy, I was entirely grateful for the existence of this book. Russell offers not only an expansive view of western philosophy within rigorous historical context, but manages to convey much of his own philosophy within his critiques. I came, over time, to look at this book as more an expression of Russell's philosophy in relation to the entire course of western thought. How could it be anything different? Russell's perspective is, however well-informed, quite one-sided. So much so that the individual philosophers he takes on have no hope of a fair trial. However much I agree with him about Nietzsche, Russell does not even attempt to be fair. Better to appreciate this book for what it is: a personal view. As such, it is quite expansive, and if you need to know more about western philosophy, you'll easily fill in the missing pieces if you start here. But don't run away hurt if your favorite philosopher gets short shrift - I also find myself disagreeing with Russell in many areas. Instead, as you read, try to keep what he accomplishes here separate from how he does it. This is truly a great work, and downplaying its importance because of skipping or riding some particular fellow would be like criticizing the Great Wall of China because they used sub-par mortar. Here is a journey through history through the eyes of one great man. Keep yours open and you may learn something.
72 of 78 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Bertrand Russell's "History of Western Philosophy," quite simply, is the best all-around history I've seen. Will Durant's is accessible but more informative about its subjects lives than their thoughts. Copleston's history is much more informative but much too long (11 vol.) for any but the most serious student. Antony Flew's, for all of its strenghts, presumes much more technical knowlege than the average lay reader will have. Russell's book, then, seems the best all around intro - it is long enough but not too long, detailed enough but not overly technical, and interesting enough while remaining all the while informative. And unlike all of the others, Russell writes with the impeccable clarity we expect from him, and admirable enthusiasm.
Russell's layout is thus: he sets the stage for each section (ancient, scholastic, enlightenment, romantic, modern) by giving a brief historical chapter. Once done, he sets to work on a 10-20 page walk through of each prominent philosopher therein. While he is quite objective throughout (with the occasional biting remark for humor), he generally finishes each 'walk through' with a critique from his perspective of the philosopher in question. These are useful for both the lay person (who has fodder for thought) and the more experienced reader (who gets both the philosopher's and Russell's view).
Before I finish my review of this remarkably clear and interesting book, I must present a quote from the book that I feel is endemic of Russell and how he approaches all the multifarious philosophers that fill these pages. The quote intros his section on Greek philosopher Heraclitus:
"In studying a philosopher, the right attitude is neither reverence nor contempt, but first, a kind of hypothetical sympathy, until it is possible to know what it feels like to bleieve in his theories, and only then a revival of the critical attitude... Two things are to be remembered: that a man whose opinions and theories are worth studying may be presumed to have had some intellegence, but that no man is likely to have arrived at complete and final truth on any subject whatever." (Chapter IV, paragraph 4)
Yes, Russell has biases (as has been duly noted in these reviews); yes, he makes occasional biting comments and undoubtedly betrays misunderstandings (though none, I think, deliberate). All the while though, it is obvious that in these pages, Russell presents his subject as honestly, excitedly, and (yes!) fairly as he can. Even when he does express his opinion, it seems obvious to me that he lets you know when he is doing so, and never proposes (as do many philosophers) to have the last word on the subject or to make the readers' minds up for them.
Excellent book.
Russell's layout is thus: he sets the stage for each section (ancient, scholastic, enlightenment, romantic, modern) by giving a brief historical chapter. Once done, he sets to work on a 10-20 page walk through of each prominent philosopher therein. While he is quite objective throughout (with the occasional biting remark for humor), he generally finishes each 'walk through' with a critique from his perspective of the philosopher in question. These are useful for both the lay person (who has fodder for thought) and the more experienced reader (who gets both the philosopher's and Russell's view).
Before I finish my review of this remarkably clear and interesting book, I must present a quote from the book that I feel is endemic of Russell and how he approaches all the multifarious philosophers that fill these pages. The quote intros his section on Greek philosopher Heraclitus:
"In studying a philosopher, the right attitude is neither reverence nor contempt, but first, a kind of hypothetical sympathy, until it is possible to know what it feels like to bleieve in his theories, and only then a revival of the critical attitude... Two things are to be remembered: that a man whose opinions and theories are worth studying may be presumed to have had some intellegence, but that no man is likely to have arrived at complete and final truth on any subject whatever." (Chapter IV, paragraph 4)
Yes, Russell has biases (as has been duly noted in these reviews); yes, he makes occasional biting comments and undoubtedly betrays misunderstandings (though none, I think, deliberate). All the while though, it is obvious that in these pages, Russell presents his subject as honestly, excitedly, and (yes!) fairly as he can. Even when he does express his opinion, it seems obvious to me that he lets you know when he is doing so, and never proposes (as do many philosophers) to have the last word on the subject or to make the readers' minds up for them.
Excellent book.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
jwylde
If you want a well written book on the history of philosophy, and do not already have a philosophy of your own, this is your book. Read more
Published 15 days ago by J. Wylde
Great Philosopher, Great Man, so-so History
Bertrand Russell was the greatest philosopher of the 20th century. He was also a great man in other ways. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Stephen Schwartz
More Likely To Confuse Than Clarify
I was just watching the great debate between Bertrand Russell and Fr. Copleston online again at the video site, and it is so charming, the whole thing. Read more
Published 3 months ago by Peter P. Fuchs
Delightfully readable yet usually insufferable
This book is vintage Russell: exceptionally written yet cheerfully oblivious to his own blind spots. Read more
Published 4 months ago by King Gustavus Adolphus
Excellent introduction to the history of western philosophy!
I listened to this as an unabridged audiobook. I was thoroughly impressed. Russel presents the history of western philosophy in a clear, concise way. Read more
Published 4 months ago by Reverend Aaron
Good supplement to Durant's book
I started this shortly after reading Durant's History of Philosophy book, so its hard not to compare the two. Read more
Published 5 months ago by David T.
What Tripe!
This book would belong to Russell's "popular period," i.e., the period after which he had his magnum opus destroyed by Wittgenstein, a philosophical novice, at the time. Read more
Published 5 months ago by Rusty Gentry
Microscopic analysis
The analysis of the philosophers and their philosophies is done with clinical precision. But somewhere you begin to feel the harshness of the criticism and the cynicism of the... Read more
Published 8 months ago by A reader
The history of Philosophy by a great Philosopher
Bertrand Russell was one of the founding fathers of the analytic tradition of philosophy in the 20th century. Read more
Published 11 months ago by Ed
Why This History Stands Above the Rest
I learned in college that "great" philosophers are largely those who were most influential. Each attempted some sort of logically consistent concept of reality. Read more
Published 12 months ago by Mark
Customers Also Bought Items By
Inside This Book
(learn more)
First Sentence:
IN all history, nothing is so surprising or so difficult to account for as the sudden rise of civilization in Greece. Read the first page Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
magnanimous man Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Saint Augustine, Middle Ages, Saint Thomas, Saint Paul, Marcus Aurelius, Western Empire, Old Testament, Catholic Church, French Revolution, Thomas Aquinas, Asia Minor, Saint Ambrose, Gregory the Great, Eastern Empire, James Mill, United States, George Washington, New Testament, Saint Jerome, Saint Francis, City State, Holy Ghost, Platonic Socrates, Duns Scotus, John the Scot New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
IN all history, nothing is so surprising or so difficult to account for as the sudden rise of civilization in Greece. Read the first page Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
magnanimous man Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Saint Augustine, Middle Ages, Saint Thomas, Saint Paul, Marcus Aurelius, Western Empire, Old Testament, Catholic Church, French Revolution, Thomas Aquinas, Asia Minor, Saint Ambrose, Gregory the Great, Eastern Empire, James Mill, United States, George Washington, New Testament, Saint Jerome, Saint Francis, City State, Holy Ghost, Platonic Socrates, Duns Scotus, John the Scot New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Citations (learn more)
This book cites 79
books:
See all 79 books this book cites
100
books
cite this book:
See all 100 books citing this book
- Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume, and Rousseau by John Locke on 7 pages
- The Social Contract (Penguin Classics) by Jean-Jacques Rousseau on 6 pages
- Civil War (Great Adventures in History) by Raymond Friday Locke on 4 pages
- Saint Augustine by Rebecca West on 4 pages
- Early Greek Philosophy by John Burnet on page 22, page 32, and page 33
See all 79 books this book cites
- Wisdom, Information and Wonder: What is Knowledge For? by Mary Midgley on 6 pages
- The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener by Martin Gardner on 5 pages
- Appointment Denied : The Inquisition of Bertrand Russell by Thom Weidlich on 5 pages
- E.A. Burtt: Historian and Philosopher - A Study of the Author of The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 226) by D. Villemaire on page 57, Back Matter (1), and Back Matter (2)
- Mysticism: Its History and Challenge by Bruno Borchert on page 223, page 307, and Back Matter
See all 100 books citing this book
Books on Related Topics
(learn more)
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Listmania!
|
|
So You'd Like to...
Look for Similar Items by Category
Your Recent History (What's this?)
|
After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. |
